itd-21's scaffold files the starter intent as `itd-1`; 24-decide says every minting family draws timestamp ids through one mint that reads no maximum.

itd-21's scaffold files the starter intent as itd-1; 24-decide says every minting family draws timestamp ids through one mint that reads no maximum.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-21-no-lifeboat-scaffolding.md:32 — "capturing the project's mission as itd-1"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/24-decide.md:125 — "four-digit uniform suffix every other minting family draws through"

itd-21 has the scaffold's starter intent capture the project's mission as itd-1. 24-decide describes ids as the twelve-digit UTC stamp plus the four-digit uniform suffix every other minting family draws through recordid.Minter, a mint that reads no maximum. Under that mint no newly created intent can carry the ordinal id itd-1, so the scaffold as written cannot produce what it promises.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 622.

Grounds

• declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536) as a duplicate of iss-2610262031362851. Same draft edit as iss-2610262031362851, set against a different statement of the same current state.