itd-2609301020001595 quotes an unnamed product thinker, while the personas principle forbids generic attribution

itd-2609301020001595 quotes an unnamed product thinker, while the personas principle forbids generic attribution

A premise contradiction (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-2609301020001595-a-dependabot-bump-of-a-pinned-action-in.md:25 — "said a product thinker landing their third release-workflow bump of the week"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/01-product/05-personas.md:5 — "never use generic "a hypothetical user" phrasing (loses voice)"

The draft's customer quote is attributed to a product thinker landing their third release-workflow bump of the week, with no registered name. The personas page codifies never using generic hypothetical-user phrasing, because named placeholders keep quotes grounded. The quote takes the generic form the principle rules out.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 162.