Development record
itd-2609301918174237 quotes an unnamed product thinker, while the personas principle forbids generic attribution
issueopennitpickiss-2610262031418522
itd-2609301918174237 quotes an unnamed product thinker, while the personas principle forbids generic attribution
A premise contradiction (severity nitpick) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-2609301918174237-a-provider-off-this-machine-takes-a-file.md:21— "said a product thinker who pays for an aggregator" - End B:
.abcd/development/brief/01-product/05-personas.md:5— "never use generic "a hypothetical user" phrasing (loses voice)"
The draft's customer quote is attributed to a product thinker who pays for an aggregator, with no registered name. The personas page codifies never using generic hypothetical-user phrasing, because named placeholders keep quotes grounded. The quote takes the generic form the principle rules out.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 163.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262031418522 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | open |
| severity | nitpick |
.abcd/work/issues/open/iss-2610262031418522-itd-2609301918174237-quotes-an-unnamed.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
References1
- itd-2609301918174237A remote provider takes a file-reading agent only as a fixed, blanked, capped bundlerelated