The mental model says a standalone intent ships as one spec; itd-2609091034175565, planned alone, is delivered through two specs.

The mental model says a standalone intent ships as one spec; itd-2609091034175565, planned alone, is delivered through two specs.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/01-product/03-mental-model.md:64 — "one press-release-shaped user moment, ships as one spec"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-2609091034175565-nothing-tells-an-agent-that-a-record-it.md:238 — "Two specs under this one intent, both built today"

The brief defines the standalone kind as one user moment that ships as one spec. The reservation intent is not a bundle, yet it is planned and delivered as two specs, and it ships only when both close. Both statements cannot describe a standalone intent's delivery.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 233.