The memory substrate has principle-distiller route pages between a repo scope and a user scope; the library chapter says the curator role and user-scope memory are not built.

The memory substrate has principle-distiller route pages between a repo scope and a user scope; the library chapter says the curator role and user-scope memory are not built.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/brief/05-internals/07-memory.md:16 — "Which scope a curated page lands in is decided by principle-distiller at curation time"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/07-library.md:413 — "Not built: a curator role on the principle-distiller agent (the agent and the disembark sub-verb it feeds ship; this role does not), ingest and ask run reports, user-scope memory outside the repo, and the automatic extraction of a spec's modification grammar into the store at spec completion."

07-memory says the scope a curated page lands in is decided by principle-distiller at curation time, across a repo scope and a user scope at ~/.abcd.noindex/memory/, and describes retrieval querying both. 07-library lists as not built 'a curator role on the principle-distiller agent', 'user-scope memory outside the repo', and the modification-grammar extraction 07-memory also describes. A routing decision made by a role that does not exist, into a scope that does not exist, cannot be current behaviour.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 439.