itd-138's install script finishes by running abcd version; the board chapter says version is a retired name answered with its replacement.

itd-138's install script finishes by running abcd version; the board chapter says version is a retired name answered with its replacement.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-138-bob-installs-abcd-with-one-checksum.md:25 — "print the PATH fix when needed, and finish with abcd version"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/08-abcd.md:456 — "A name retired with no alias is answered with what replaced it, and never as a stale binary"

itd-138 says the install script served from the project's domain, rendered from the same template as the README one-liner, finishes with abcd version. 08-abcd says a name retired with no alias, version among them, is answered with what replaced it, the version report now being the root's version flag. An installer whose last step invokes a retired name ends on the refusal of an unknown command rather than on the version report the intent promises.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 526.

Grounds

• declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536): a later record already settles which end holds. site-src/install.sh.tmpl runs abcd --version as its last line, so the shipped script already matches 08-abcd.md.