itd-1 says reviews of implementations return SHIP / NEEDS_WORK / MAJOR_RETHINK; the build's implementation reviewers return SHIP or FIX FIRST.

itd-1 says reviews of implementations return SHIP / NEEDS_WORK / MAJOR_RETHINK; the build's implementation reviewers return SHIP or FIX FIRST.

A terminology drift (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/disciplines/itd-1-acceptance-gates.md:47 — "(SHIP / NEEDS_WORK / MAJOR_RETHINK) which score changes/runs"
• End B: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/34-build.md:696 — "stating one verdict of its role (SHIP or FIX FIRST"

itd-1 fixes one set of review verdicts, kept separate from criterion verdicts, for reviews of plans, implementations and completions: SHIP / NEEDS_WORK / MAJOR_RETHINK. In 34-build the validators review a lane's implementation, and the loop reads one verdict per role: SHIP or FIX FIRST. The two documents give different words for the same set of verdicts, so a reader built from itd-1 would reject what the build's reviewers return.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 709.