This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

itd-1 says the SHIP/NEEDS_WORK/MAJOR_RETHINK review verdicts score plan and implementation reviews; 01-agents limits them to a packed lifeboat

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262038399413

itd-1 says the SHIP/NEEDS_WORK/MAJOR_RETHINK review verdicts score plan and implementation reviews; 01-agents limits them to a packed lifeboat

A terminology drift (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/intents/disciplines/itd-1-acceptance-gates.md:47 — "which score changes/runs (oracle reviews of plans, implementations, completions; consumed by the native receipt schema validator)"
  • End B: .abcd/development/brief/05-internals/01-agents.md:222 — "{SHIP, NEEDS_WORK, MAJOR_RETHINK} — assess a packed lifeboat."

itd-1 says the review-verdict family scores changes and runs: oracle reviews of plans, implementations and completions. 01-agents, which itd-1 cross-references, says that family assesses a packed lifeboat only, and that the implement loop's reviewers use words of their own. So 'review verdict' covers two different scopes, and a builder cannot tell which verdicts a plan or implementation review returns.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 809.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536) as a duplicate of iss-2610262037142878. Same stale parenthetical in itd-1 line 47, cited against 01-agents.md instead of 34-build.md.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262038399413
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References1

mentions2