This is the record of an abcd-managed repository

abcdBetav0.16.2 · 2026-11-06

Development record

The README's `abcd rules` loads a machine-wide rules.json layer, which itd-3 explicitly rejects.

issuewontfixminoriss-2610262039423717

The README's abcd rules loads a machine-wide rules.json layer, which itd-3 explicitly rejects.

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

  • End A: .abcd/development/brief/04-surfaces/README.md:283 — "the bundled default domains, then the machine's ~/.abcd.noindex/rules.json, then the"
  • End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-3-modular-rules-loader.md:41 — "Keeping a personal cross-repo rules file recreates exactly the"

The rules verb section says the loader reads the bundled domains, then the machine's ~/.abcd.noindex/rules.json, then the checkout's .abcd/rules.json. itd-3, the shipped intent the README names as delivering rules, lists a global user rules file as explicitly rejected, because it recreates the scaffolding-outside-the-repo failure, and says the loader is per-repo only. itd-3 does not record the later reversal, so the two documents give opposite answers on whether a user layer exists.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 880.

Grounds

  • declined: Closed in the 2026-10-27 triage (dcn-2610271112330536) as a duplicate of iss-2610262038011053. Same itd-3 out-of-scope line against a different document that reads the machine layer.

Frontmatter

idiss-2610262039423717
typeissue
lifecyclewontfix
severityminor

References1

mentions2