The relocatable-home draft has abcd move its home on command, but the shipped rename ruled that abcd moves nothing and fixed the name at ~/.abcd.noindex

The relocatable-home draft has abcd move its home on command, but the shipped rename ruled that abcd moves nothing and fixed the name at ~/.abcd.noindex

A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.

• End A: .abcd/development/intents/drafts/itd-77-relocatable-user-home.md:17 — "a guided, wizard-style flow moves the home wherever the user's filing system wants it"
• End B: .abcd/development/intents/shipped/itd-2610030720038073-abcd-keeps-its-home-folder-out-of.md:99 — "abcd moves nothing. An existing ~/.abcd stops every abcd command and hook before it writes anything"

itd-77 promises a guided flow in which abcd moves the user-level home anywhere and re-points every consumer. itd-2610030720038073 dropped abcd's own move of the home ('abcd moves nothing') and carries no move code. It also relies on the .noindex name for the indexer to skip the folder, which a home moved by name elsewhere would lose. The two records disagree on whether abcd moves its home.

Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 1206.