commands/lint.md presents the abcd-lint:allow line waiver as applying to any finding, but only the privacy-hygiene rule consumes it; a user waiving a docs-currency/three-tier-layout/etc finding gets a silent no-op and a stray committed token, colliding with docs-currency's own differently-spelled escape

commands/lint.md presents the abcd-lint:allow line waiver as applying to any finding, but only the privacy-hygiene rule consumes it; a user waiving a docs-currency/three-tier-layout/etc finding gets a silent no-op and a stray committed token, colliding with docs-currency's own differently-spelled escape

Evidence

• commands/lint.md (the waiver sentence) -- scoped to no rule.
• internal/core/repolint/rule_privacy.go:42,49,112 -- the only consumer of the waiver constants; no other rule file references either.
• rule_docs.go:79 / rule_positioning.go:86 emit line-anchored findings where the marker is a no-op; docs-currency's real escape is the differently-spelled docs-lint allow comment.

Refuter verdict -- CONFIRMED (substantive, lower end)

Every other statement of the waiver in the record scopes it to privacy-hygiene (brief 16-lint.md:52, prepare-this-repo.md:96-99, CHANGELOG). commands/lint.md is the lone outlier; entered unscoped and survived the audit->lint rename. Fix: scope the sentence to privacy-hygiene findings and note other rules have no line waiver.