Development record
The out-of-scope page says a later intent enters work by being scoped into a phase; the build sequence says phases are retired and their documents are history.
The out-of-scope page says a later intent enters work by being scoped into a phase; the build sequence says phases are retired and their documents are history.
A premise contradiction (severity minor) found by the cross-document consistency pass.
- End A:
.abcd/development/brief/06-delivery/03-out-of-scope.md:172— "A later-phase intent enters work by being scoped into a phase, then promoted toplanned/via/abcd:intent plan <itd-N>." - End B:
.abcd/development/brief/06-delivery/01-build-sequence.md:7— "the product phases that once bundled it are retired"
03-out-of-scope describes the live path into work as being scoped into a phase and then planned, and it frames the brief around eight planned phases. 01-build-sequence says the product phases that once bundled the intent set are retired (adr-2609212115255771), so no phase is left to scope an intent into.
Evidence: .abcd/work/reviews/2026-10-26-consistency/00-summary.md, finding 931.
Frontmatter
| id | iss-2610262040267270 |
|---|---|
| type | issue |
| lifecycle | open |
| severity | minor |
.abcd/work/issues/open/iss-2610262040267270-the-out-of-scope-page-says-a-later.md
open on GitHub ↗ · commit history ↗
mentions3
- adr-2609212115255771Phases and milestones are retired: sequencing is dependencies rendered as status, the checkpoint is the derived release
- iss-2610262033444397The out-of-scope page frames the brief as the work of eight planned phases; the reflect chapter says adr-2609212115255771 retired the phase.
- iss-2610262042040605The out-of-scope chapter says intents enter work by being scoped into a phase; the vocabulary intent retired phases in favour of dependencies and the lifecycle shelves.